digg_url =”http://gaggle.info/post/115/a-tale-of-3-audiences-google-violates-its-dont-be-evil-motto”;

What? Where? Who Were They & How Did They Vote?
Google violates its “don’t be evil” motto
1. Before the debate (For the motion: 21% ; Against the motion: 31% ; Undecided: 48%)
2. After the debate (For the motion: 47% ; Against the motion: 47% ; Undecided: 6%)
3. Saul Hansell’s article @ NYTimes Bit’s Blog — Comments (For the motion: 22% ; Against the motion: 28% ; Undecided: 50%)
“Rational” vs “Prejudiced”
Note that if it can be assumed that the 42% who apparently “made up their mind” as a result of the debate (well, it’s complicated
were simply “in addition to” those people who had previously made up their minds (and who subsequently stuck to their previous convictions), then this group (“rational” group) is markedly different from those who had made up their minds beforhand (“prejudiced” group).
These 2 (hypothetical) subgroups voted as follows (note that the “prejudiced” group [52%] is slightly larger than the “rational” group [42%], but the remaining “don’t know” group is relatively small [6%]):
“Prejudiced” group: For the motion: 40% ; Against the motion: 60%
“Rational” group: For the motion: 62% ; Against the motion: 38%